Open Stack

Just sending this out to the Operator Community for more feedback.

We'll be having a session at the summit about it, but I'd like to get this
discussion going a little more here if we could.

--Joe

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Joseph Bajin <josephbajin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Operators,
>
> At the last OSOps Tools and Monitoring meeting, we had mriedem (Nova Team)
> talk with us about a proposal that they are working on. The Nova team would
> like to abandon the use of a wish-list as it has grown to an unmanageable
> size.  They have posted a few times to both the operators list [1] as well
> as the developers list [2] about their idea.  They would like to work with
> us operators to find the best way to get our ideas into their
> prioritization list. At the mid-cycle and summit meet-ups, we continue to
> create etherpads [3] that make mention to the troubles we have, as well as
> the work we have done to overcome them. These are examples of the work that
> the NOVA team would like to hear about.
>
> I'd like to gather some ideas and thoughts from the operator community on
> not only the NOVA proposal but ways that we could get the feedback we
> create each cycle to each of the respective projects.  One idea that I have
> is using the OSOps repo as a way for us to gather and track these wishlist
> type of items.  Then the OSOps working group could be used to help try get
> these worked on.
>
> I'd love to get help and hear ideas from others about how we could improve
> and build on this process. Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-March/009942.html
> [2]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/089365.html
> [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operator-local-patches
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160405/7541a0b0/attachment.html>