Open Stack

+1

________________________________
From: Christopher Aedo
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 3:51:23 PM
To: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Design Summit Tracks - Agenda on Sched

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are still lacking:
>
> * Moderator(s) for Quotas and Billing
> * Content for about 3 slots.
>
> If you have interest for any of this, please speak now - time is running
> out!

I'm very interested in having an operator focused discussion about
delivering apps to your users, and whether or not that matters to the
cloud operators out there.  Apps on OpenStack is something near and
dear to my heart (working on apps.openstack.org), is it important to
the operators of clouds though?

I know a few of the bigger public cloud providers have worked on their
own approaches to this (using Heat templates, Murano apps, or some
other PaaS layers).  I think there's a big benefit to a common catalog
of apps that everyone can use, but maybe the big operators want to
exert more control by keeping an independent catalog?  Or maybe there
are other reasons?

Please speak up if you're interested in this topic, I'd be very happy
to moderate, and I think if we can get some operators talking together
about this there would be a lot of value in the conversation!

-Christopher

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151012/682df610/attachment.html>