[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.
Fox, Kevin M
Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov
Fri Nov 6 20:10:11 UTC 2015
Kind of related, as an op, we see a lot of 3rd party repositories that recently only supported rhel5 move to finally supporting rhel6 because rhel7 came out and rhel5 went to long term support contract only. This caused us to have to support rhel5 way longer then we would have liked. Now, we're stuck at 6 instead of 7. :/
Some number of users will stick with juno until it is EOL and then move. Sometimes its because its a desire to not make a change. Sometimes its considered a good thing by the ops that they finally have a "good enough" excuse (EOL) to move forward "finally" (sigh of relief). :)
From: Jesse Keating [jlk at bluebox.net]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:14 AM
To: Dan Smith
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.
We (Blue Box, an IBM company) do have a lot of installs on Juno, however we'll be aggressively moving to Kilo, so we are not interested in keeping Juno alive.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Dan Smith <dms at danplanet.com<mailto:dms at danplanet.com>> wrote:
> Worth mentioning that OpenStack releases that come out at the same time
> as Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04 + Essex, 14.04 + Icehouse, 16.04 + Mitaka)
> are supported for 5 years by Canonical so are already kind of an LTS.
> Support in this context means patches, updates and commercial support
> (for a fee).
> For paying customers 3 years of patches, updates and commercial support
> for April releases, (Kilo, O, Q etc..) is also available.
Yeah. IMHO, this is what you pay your vendor for. I don't think upstream
maintaining an older release for so long is a good use of people or CI
resources, especially given how hard it can be for us to keep even
recent stable releases working and maintained.
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-operators