C'mon Matt, we don't just bash someone's idea without at least a couple of points to back up our assertions - that's not very nice :) Regards, Tom On 19/06/15 04:43, matt wrote: > This seems like a terrible use case, and a terrible idea for openstack > and operators both. > > =/ > > -Matt > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Barrett, Carol L > <carol.l.barrett at intel.com <mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com>> wrote: > > Operators – The Enterprise Work Group (formerly known as Win The > Enterprise) has a team working on a Proof Of Concept for using > Metadata to describe requirements for legacy apps and workloads to > be on boarded onto an OpenStack Cloud. > > We have 2 use cases that we are planning to implement: Encrypted > Storage and Workload Isolation. > You can find these use cases here: > > I am asking for your help: > > 1. We’re looking for an Operator who has a real world example of > either of these use cases and can share information about config > and overall requirements. We want to make sure our PoC is realistic. > 2. We need more use cases to run through our PoC. Do you have > Legacy App or Workload that you can work with us to write up a > use case around? > > > > If you’re game for either of these please let me know. > Thanks > Carol Barrett > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >