[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Should Keystone emit notifications by default?

Matt Riedemann mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Feb 2 17:55:53 UTC 2015



On 6/5/2014 10:02 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
> On 5 June 2014 16:46, Assaf Muller <amuller at redhat.com
> <mailto:amuller at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Keystone started emitting notifications [1] for users and tenants
>     being created / updated /
>     deleted during the Havana cycle. This was in response to bug [2],
>     the fact that OpenStack
>     doesn't clean up after itself when tenants are deleted. Currently,
>     Keystone does not emit
>     these notifications by default, and I propose it should. According
>     to the principle of least
>     surprise, I would imagine that if an admin deleted a tenant he would
>     expect that all of its
>     resources would be deleted, making the default configuration values
>     in Keystone and the other
>     projects very important. I wouldn't want to rely on the different
>     deployment tools to change
>     the needed configuration values.
>
>     I was hoping to get some feedback from operators regarding this.
>
>
> As a deployer, I most certainly would prefer that this is enabled by
> default.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>

Re-posted and changed the subject here [1], trying to get some 
cross-project focus on this for the Vancouver summit.

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/055801.html

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann




More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list