Open Stack

and we generally run a much newer Horizon and Keystone than the rest of the
services. We had Horizon and Keystone on POST KILO (master after Kilo
released) while still running Juno on all other services. Worked fine.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, David Medberry <openstack at medberry.net>
wrote:

> Hi Eren,
>
> I'm pretty sure NECTaR is doing diff versions at different sites in a
> widely distributed way.
>
> https://www.openstack.org/user-stories/nectar/
>
> I've cc'd Sam as well. He's your man.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Eren Türkay <erent at skyatlas.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello operators,
>>
>> I am wondering if anyone is using different versions of Openstack in
>> different
>> sites.
>>
>> We have our first site which is Juno, and we are now having another site
>> where
>> we are planning to deploy Kilo. Does anyone have experience with different
>> versions of installation? Particularly, our Horizon and other clients
>> will be
>> Juno, but they will talk to secondary site which is Kilo. Inferring from
>> the
>> release notes, Kilo API looks backward compatible with Juno, so I'm a
>> little
>> optimistic about it but still I'm not sure.
>>
>> Any help is appreciated,
>> Eren
>>
>> --
>> Eren Türkay, System Administrator
>> https://skyatlas.com/ | +90 850 885 0357
>>
>> Yildiz Teknik Universitesi Davutpasa Kampusu
>> Teknopark Bolgesi, D2 Blok No:107
>> Esenler, Istanbul Pk.34220
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150826/afefa4ed/attachment.html>