Open Stack

I read all of the proposed documents. One of my question is not
answered. Is there any operational issue when install neutron(network
service) on the compute node? Due to my physical node limitation my
initial deploymet plan is as follows:

Node#1: Controller
Node#2: Compute + Controller (Controller Fail-over)
Node#3: Compute

I want to install neutron service on my node#3.

Is there any operational issue when install neutron(network service)
on the compute node(Node#3)?

Thanks in advance.


On 10/26/14, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Really thanks for your opinion.
>
> On 10/26/14, Juan José Pavlik Salles <jjpavlik at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Hossein, I wouldn't use a VM from the cloud as a controller failover,
>> it
>> would complicate things unnecessarily. What I would do is: use one of the
>> compute nodes a controller failover.  You can install the APIs easily on
>> the compute node and the rest of the software too.
>>
>> 2014-10-26 10:38 GMT-03:00 Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolzadeh at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> With three node deployment in mind(one controller and 2 compute
>>> nodes), in order to acheive minimum HA with threse three physical
>>> nodes, is it possible to setup second controller as a virtual machine
>>> on one of my compute node?
>>> Does this approach improve HA in my deployment(atleast until my other
>>> physical nodes become available)?
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> On 10/25/14, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Thanks for your useful answers.
>>> > Very helpful resource and guides.
>>> >
>>> > On 10/23/14, Adam Lawson <alawson at aqorn.com> wrote:
>>> >> Your dilemna looks like this as I see it:
>>> >>
>>> >> Highly-Available, Highly-Scalable, Limited Hardware. Pick any 2.
>>> >>
>>> >> In an ideal world we'd all like the benefits of everything with
>>> >> limited
>>> >> resources. True HA requires some meaningful separation (logical
>>> >> fencing
>>> >> if
>>> >> you will). You can't do that with only 3 nodes so you need to make
>>> >> some
>>> >> concessions. Starting with motivation that begins your efforts within
>>> >> Openstack Docs per Anne. ; )
>>> >>
>>> >> Mahalo,
>>> >> Adam
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> *Adam Lawson*
>>> >>
>>> >> AQORN, Inc.
>>> >> 427 North Tatnall Street
>>> >> Ste. 58461
>>> >> Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
>>> >> Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101
>>> >> International: +1 302-387-4660
>>> >> Direct: +1 916-246-2072
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Hossein Zabolzadeh
>>> >>> <zabolzadeh at gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hi there,
>>> >>>> I have an openstack deployment question. I have three physical
>>> >>>> server(Configurations are listed in the following). What is the
>>> >>>> best
>>> >>>> optimized production-ready deployment model to achieve the
>>> >>>> following
>>> >>>> goals in mind(Users will not exceeds more than 10)?
>>> >>>> - Ability to add more services(compute, controller, storage node)
>>> >>>> later, without service interruption
>>> >>>> - Ability to provide HA for all services, after more nodes added
>>> >>>> without service interruption
>>> >>>> - No need to change the deployment architecture later when more
>>> >>>> physical nodes and resources available(My physical infrastructure
>>> >>>> will
>>> >>>> be scaled later, and not limitted to these three physical
>>> >>>> machines).
>>> >>>> For example I don't know is it better to have 1 neutron node, or
>>> >>>> have
>>> >>>> two neutron service on my two compute nodes?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi - Have you read:
>>> >>> http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/scaling.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> and
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/example_architecture.html#example_architecture-neutron
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Horizontal scaling is covered in these as well as your neutron
>>> question.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anne
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> A really appreciate any helps.
>>> >>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> >>>> ------
>>> >>>> Server 1:
>>> >>>> RAM: 128GB
>>> >>>> HDD: 300GB
>>> >>>> ------
>>> >>>> Server 2:
>>> >>>> RAM: 128GB
>>> >>>> HDD: 300GB
>>> >>>> ------
>>> >>>> Server 3:
>>> >>>> RAM: 256GB
>>> >>>> HDD: 512GB
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> >>>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>> >>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> >>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pavlik Salles Juan José
>> Blog - http://viviendolared.blogspot.com
>>
>