[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Storage Backend: Sheepdog, Ceph, or GlusterFS

Hossein Zabolzadeh zabolzadeh at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 06:42:25 UTC 2014

Thanks Jesse,
But about sheepdog, I saw a presenation of sheepdog and openstack
integration. In this presentation, it is claimed that sheepdog is
unified storage backend for swift, cinder and glance.
Check the attachment.
See: https://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-videos/presentation/sheepdog-yet-another-all-in-one-storage-for-openstack
Presentation Title: Yet Another All-In-One Storage for Openstack

On 11/7/14, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretorius at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 November 2014 13:01, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference
>> between them...
>> - Which one is better support in openstack?
>> - Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack
>> storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)?
> I don't think that Gluster or Sheepdog provide a storage back-end capable
> of providing block storage (cinder) and object storage (swift) back-ends.
> Only Ceph provides a properly unified back-end for both. Ceph has also been
> supported for cinder for over two years - it's very mature. The Rados
> Gateway (Object Storage/Swift Interface) is much more recent, but I have
> yet to see problems with it - as long as you do acknowledge that it is not
> Swift.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sheepdog2.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 56411 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20141107/9a579271/attachment-0001.jpg>

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list