[Openstack-operators] Distributed Filesystem

Razique Mahroua razique.mahroua at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 21:41:53 UTC 2013


I was about to use CephFS (Bobtail) but the I can't resize the instances without having CephFS crashing.
I'm currently considering GlusterFS which not only provides great performance, it's also pretty much easy to administer  :)

Le 17 avr. 2013 à 22:07, JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Glance and Nova with MooseFS.
> Reliable, good performance and easy configuration.
> 
> ---
> JuanFra
> 
> 
> 2013/4/17 Jacob Godin <jacobgodin at gmail.com>
> Hi all,
> 
> Just a quick survey for all of you running distributed file systems for nova-compute instance storage. What are you running? Why are you using that particular file system?
> 
> We are currently running CephFS and chose it because we are already using Ceph for volume and image storage. It works great, except for snapshotting, where we see slow performance and high CPU load.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20130417/ba263097/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list