[Openstack-operators] Question regarding to referencearchitecture.org

Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi vivekraghuwanshi at gmail.com
Tue May 1 14:03:17 UTC 2012


Thanks Duncan

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Duncan McGreggor <duncan at dreamhost.com>wrote:

> Jason,
>
> Folks from CERN and NeCTAR [1] have expressed interest in sharing
> their cloud architectures and reference materials.
>
> Should they go through you, and get their data/images put up on
> http://www.referencearchitecture.org/ ?
>
> d
>
>
> [1] Associated with the University of Melbourne, http://nectar.org.au/
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Jason Cannavale
> <jason.cannavale at rackspace.com> wrote:
> > Hi Igor, Vivek,
> >
> > Apologies for the confusion. This site was put together quite some time
> ago
> > (between Cactus and Diablo releases) and only took into consideration the
> > nova and swift projects, and has not been updated since that time.
> > Unfortunately, there was no consideration for nova-volumes, however your
> > assumption is correct that the huge local storage on the compute nodes
> was
> > for the image download from glance to the compute node, booting the
> image,
> > and providing some local storage for the instances themselves.
> >
> >
> > In the case of images and snapshots the document makes the assumption
> that
> > swift was the backend for glance. In this case you would have glance-api
> and
> > glance-registry running on the controller node with the swift middleware
> and
> > would follow the swift portion of the reference architecture.
> >
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > From: Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi <vivekraghuwanshi at gmail.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:59 PM
> > To: Igor Laskovy <igor.laskovy at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
> > <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Question regarding to
> > referencearchitecture.org
> >
> > Yes and to store images and snapshorts
> >
> > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Igor Laskovy <igor.laskovy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all!
> >>
> >> I am new to the openstack. I have question regarding to
> >> http://www.referencearchitecture.org/physical-deployment/ .
> >> This design shown a two controller nodes, one brand iSCSI DAS and a
> >> lot of compute nodes. Controller nodes has small local storages and
> >> connectivity to iSCSI DAS. Compute nodes, according to "Rule of
> >> Thumb): 4 to 8 GB RAM and 1 Spindle Per Core", has a lot of local
> >> spaces each one.
> >> So how work Nova-volumes here? It is running on controller node and
> >> use VG "nova-volumes" which based on disk via attached iSCSI DAS?
> >> After that euca-create-volume create volume and will expose it to the
> >> compute node via iSCSI again? If it is correct, what is the point to
> >> use huge local storages at compute nodes, for boot image of instances
> >> only?
> >>
> >> Igor Laskovy
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openstack-operators mailing list
> >> Openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ViVek Raghuwanshi
> > Mobile -+91-09595950504
> >
> > Skype - vivek_raghuwanshi
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openstack-operators mailing list
> > Openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >
>



-- 
ViVek Raghuwanshi
Mobile -+91-09595950504

Skype - vivek_raghuwanshi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20120501/43dd10a1/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openstack-operators mailing list