<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 November 2016 at 14:59, Thanh Ha <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thanh.ha@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">thanh.ha@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-">On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Wayne Warren <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wayne@puppet.com" target="_blank">wayne@puppet.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span><span class="gmail-">On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Thanh Ha <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thanh.ha@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">thanh.ha@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></span></span><span><span class="gmail-"><div><br></div></span></span><span class="gmail-"></span></div></div></div></blockquote><span class="gmail-"></span><span class="gmail-"><div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><a href="https://review.openstack.org/358019" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/3<wbr>58019</a> Support explicit API and simple config creation</div></div><div><br></div><div>There's also some TODO actions in the etherpad that we need to decide if we want to continue pushing for in the JJB 2.0 push.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>I think the best forum for making a decision on these items would be here on the mailing list. If everyone else agrees let's start that in this thread.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>+1 that makes sense to me.</div><span class="gmail-HOEnZb"></span></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">So on that patch:<br><span class="gmail-"><span><a href="https://review.openstack.org/358019" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/3<wbr>58019</a> Support explicit API and simple config creation<br><br></span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span class="gmail-"><span>Does it make sense? I'd like to hear other people's opinion on whether it makes sense to have an explicit API as well as a from_config(cfg) method when someone would create the config object and then pass it around, or is it more of a YAGNI?<br><br></span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span class="gmail-"><span>Since it impacts the API that will be published, seems like it would be a good idea to get this ironed out before releasing?<br clear="all"></span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Darragh Bailey<br>"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"</div>
</div></div></div>