[OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] Feedback requested for tox job definition

Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com
Thu Mar 9 15:46:06 UTC 2017


Thanks, Paul.

For me both have their strength and weaknesses:

* If you want to add a new tox job for an existing target like pep8, I
like how simple that is with
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438281/25/.zuul.yaml

* On the other hand, if you add a new tox job - for a completely new
target, then https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442180/3/.zuul.yaml allows
me to add the job in a single place instead of adding another file like
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438281/25/playbooks/tox-cover.yaml.

Knowing that most projects do not add their own non-standard jobs, the
more compact setting like 438281 wins for me - and the other way is not
too difficult either.

So, I'm fine with either solution and have a slight preference to 438281.

I fear only time will tell, whether there's really a significant
difference ;)

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126




More information about the OpenStack-Infra mailing list