[OpenStack-Infra] PuppetBoard

Anita Kuno anteaya at anteaya.info
Mon Apr 27 19:13:02 UTC 2015


On 04/27/2015 02:33 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Spencer Krum <krum.spencer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The primary maintainer of puppetboard is stepping aside:
>> https://github.com/puppet-community/puppetboard/issues/132. We use
>> puppetboard to display facts from machines and reports of puppet runs. We
>> can expect to continue to have this need into puppet 4 and puppet apply. I
>> like the idea of infra trying to help this project (we've already landed a
>> couple features) but I know we have to be strategic in where we put our
>> efforts. There is nothing wrong with our current installation (in fact it
>> could use an upgrade, it is almost a year out of date).
>>
>> There are at least two open source options if we wanted to look at
>> switching: Puppet-explorer: https://github.com/spotify/puppetexplorer and
>> Panopuppet: https://github.com/propyless/panopuppet
> 
> As a data point, prior to puppetboard, we used Puppet Dashboard, a
> fork of which we considered:
> https://github.com/sodabrew/puppet-dashboard
> 
> At the recent PuppetCampSF, author sodabrew did a talk on his plans
> for version 2, following a have-kids hiatus on the project. He's not
> planning on making distro-based packages (his expertise and time is
> better spent on project dev), but it may be worth considering again
> anyway.
> 
> Refresher, this is the bug report from the last time we did this,
> includes what we evaluated then:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1218631
> 
> It would be awesome if we didn't have to do this every year :\
> 
I'll also note that both puppetexplorer and panopuppet essentially have
one active developer apiece right now.

Not that that helps sway one way or the other.

Thanks,
Anita.



More information about the OpenStack-Infra mailing list