[Openstack-i18n] Havana - Horizon translations update

Akihiro Motoki amotoki at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 09:33:41 UTC 2013


AFAIK, only OpenStack project administrator can create a new Transifex
project like horizon_havana.
Daisy or Tom can do that.
Once a new project is created, a project administrator can configure
the setting to
track GitHub repository automatically.

On Horizon side, we don't have any automated mechanism to update POT
files in stable/havana,
so it seems better to update the POT files when cherry-picking a patch
with string update.
If so, transifex will be synced automatically after a backport patch is merged.

Regards,
Akihiro


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Julie Pichon <jpichon at redhat.com> wrote:
> "Akihiro Motoki" <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Łukasz Jernaś <deejay1 at srem.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I would like to follow the community decision when we switch Transifex
>> >> strings to Icehouse.
>> >> IMO it is better  we keep Transifex Horizon strings for Havana until
>> >> the next Havana
>> >> update (2013.2.1) at least and then switch them to Icehouse.
>> >> I can volunteer to keep Transifex Horizon up-to-date for Havana.
>> >
>> > Can't we just rename the Horizon resource as Horizon_havana and open
>> > the main resource to the master branch? That way the people who want
>> > to can use transifex to review strings incoming into master (for evil
>> > strings ;) and do some minor translation work (acknowledging that they
>> > may be gone with another update) and also we could work separately on
>> > the current stable branch.
>>
>> I think it is a good idea and possible.
>> Maintaining the development release and the latest stable release
>> sounds good to me.
>
> That sounds great to me as well. Could we also have the stable translations
> repository track the stable/havana branch? Ideally we would keep string
> changes to a minimum, but when fixes get in to change something that's
> obviously wrong (e.g. [0]) I think it would be nice to also have these
> in stable. Thoughts?
>
> Julie
>
> [0] https://github.com/openstack/horizon/commit/0314d54391775f09b35759a650dbae2e2ba567aa
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Akihiro Motoki
>>
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > --
>> > Łukasz [DeeJay1] Jernaś
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openstack-i18n mailing list
>> > Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-i18n mailing list
>> Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>>



More information about the Openstack-i18n mailing list