<html><head></head><body>Sorry for top posting, on my tablet. +1 to giving this a little time to sit. I mentioned it in the final session today and everyone seems approve but I would like to give more people a chance to comment.<br>
<br>
L<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 28 April 2016 2:40:25 pm GMT-05:00, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On 04/28/2016 02:14 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><br /><br /> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com<br /> <mailto:aj@suse.com>> wrote:<br /><br /> On 04/28/2016 12:05 PM, Lana Brindley wrote:<br /><br /> On 28/04/16 11:59, Anne Gentle wrote:<br /><br /><br /><br /> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Christian Berendt<br /> <christian@berendt.io <mailto:christian@berendt.io><br /> <mailto:christian@berendt.io <mailto:christian@berendt.io>>><br /> wrote:<br /><br /> On 28 April 2016 at 11:51:16, Andreas Jaeger<br /> (aj@suse.com <mailto:aj@suse.com> <mailto:aj@suse.com<br /> <mailto:aj@suse.com>>(mailto:aj@suse.com<br /> <mailto:aj@suse.com>
<mailto:aj@suse.com<br /> <mailto:aj@suse.com>>)) wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> Does anybody see problems with that? Otherwise let's<br /></blockquote> do that before we<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> tackle the rest of the RST conversion.<br /></blockquote><br /> Makes sense to me. What about the other guides?<br /><br /> Should we discuss to move all guides (over the<br /> migration to RST) into the openstack-manuals repository? I<br /> do not know why we have decided in the past to create<br /> separate repositories for some of the guides.<br /><br /><br /> It was for enabling review teams who knew the content best.<br /> This model still makes sense for
security guide to me. I'm<br /> fine with the Ops Guide going back into openstack-manuals<br /> but do check with anyone who has +2 specifically on the<br /> separate repo please.<br /><br /><br /> Yeah, Security Guide needs to stay in its own repo because it<br /> has different reviewing rules and needs to maintain its own core<br /> team. I've got no problem with the others moving if it's<br /> possible to do so, though.<br /><br /><br /><br /> So, only other repo to merge then would be api-site with:<br /> * content for <a href="http://developer.openstack.org">developer.openstack.org</a> <<a href="http://developer.openstack.org">http://developer.openstack.org</a>><br /> * API guide<br /> * first-app<br /><br /> We can do that if desired,<br /><br /><br /> No, let's leave it. It's a different set of contributors based on<br /> looking at last two releases.<br /></blockquote><br />Ok,
let's do only operations-guide, here's a change:<br /><br /> <a href="https://review.openstack.org/310896">https://review.openstack.org/310896</a><br /><br />I'll mark it as WIP to give some more time for discussion...<br /><br />Once that's in, we can finish the RST conversion of the guide - and <br />remove the content from operations-guide.<br /><br />I suggest to make operations-guide repository as read-only after that, <br />let's not merge anything to DocBook, let's finish ops-guide RST conversion,<br /><br />Andreas</pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>