<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/14/2014 02:13 PM, Nermina Miller
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:BB86E313-A5B4-4D2D-8644-47A57F92A86C@gmail.com"
type="cite">Rich, I'd be curious to know what constitutes fair use
or the amount of material permitted to be used without an explicit
permission request. And, secondly, which entity would be
responsible to addressing those requests? Thanks! - Nermina</blockquote>
<br>
The answer to the first question is defined by Copyright law, and I
don't have the answer on the tip of my fingers, and it may vary from
country to country. Which is why we should sidestep the question
entirely by having our documentation licensed in such a way to make
the question moot. Which ... I think we do, right? The docs, like
the code, are licensed under the Apache license.<br>
<br>
The answer to the second question is "The OpenStack Foundation", and
the answer should those requests should always be yes, up to and
including someone taking the whole body of documentation and
producing a printed version for sale. (See
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1596821930/">http://www.amazon.com/dp/1596821930/</a>
for an example of just that - the docs for another Apache-licensed
project.) This is the spirit of the Apache license, and if we
believe that the Apache license is the right one, then that's the
only conclusion we can arrive at.<br>
<br>
(Note that I'm an Apache zealot, so take anything I say with that
grain of salt.)<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Rich Bowen - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rbowen@redhat.com">rbowen@redhat.com</a>
OpenStack Community Liaison
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openstack.redhat.com/">http://openstack.redhat.com/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>