<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello all,<br>
That was a great response! And thank you for the welcome. <br>
So, what I'm hearing is that:<br>
<ul>
<li>The provisional redesign of the doc suite can be found here:
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a
href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-restructure-documentation">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-restructure-documentation</a></li>
<li>The Administration Guide (for Deployers) and the Admin Users
Guide (for Admin and End Users) might well be the same animal,
but this needs more analysis.<br>
</li>
<li>Tom has put up an analysis of the Compute Admin Guide (which
currently contains too much detail).</li>
<li>At least some of this detail will be removed to the
Configuration Reference.</li>
<li>It's still not clear whether Admin Guides per project will be
produced. (This would obviously impact the design of an
overarching Admin Guide.)<br>
</li>
<li>Diane is still doing an analysis of the SUSE Admin Guide.</li>
<li>Nick is currently working on a blueprint for the Admin Guide,
but a draft isn't yet visible.</li>
</ul>
Is there anything else that Steve and I should know? Or which I've
just blatantly misunderstood?<br>
Anne, you mentioned next week's meeting. How is that organised, and
can I jump on?<br>
<br>
Nick, will you notify the list when your first thoughts are up on
the wiki? And I'd definitely like to have a chat about it all. :)<br>
<br>
thanks, Summer<br>
<br>
--<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<div><font color="#666666">Summer Long<br>
OpenStack Documentation<br>
Engineering Content Services<br>
<br>
Red Hat Asia Pacific<br>
Brisbane, Australia</font><br>
<a href="mailto:slong@redhat.com">slong@redhat.com</a></div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>