[OpenStack-docs] [opsntack arch design] why not ceph is recommended for shared storage

Chengwei Yang chengwei.yang.cn at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 03:10:25 UTC 2017


On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:16:37PM +1100, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> Hi Chengwei,
> 
> Sounds like a bug or oversight in the doc. I suggest you find the
> "Found An Error? Report A Bug" link at the bottom of the page and file
> a bug for this.

Thanks, I'll file a bug.

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> On 16 October 2017 at 18:25, Chengwei Yang <chengwei.yang.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm now reading openstack arch design and I found that it doesn't list
> > ceph as an option for shared storage, check below
> >
> > https://docs.openstack.org/arch-design/design-compute/design-compute-storage.html
> >
> > ```
> > Choice of file system
> >
> > If you want to support shared-storage live migration, you need to
> > configure a distributed file system.
> >
> > Possible options include:
> >
> > * NFS (default for Linux)
> > * GlusterFS
> > * MooseFS
> > * Lustre
> > ```
> >
> > As I understand, we need block storage here rather than filesystem, and
> > ceph is the recommended one, am I right?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Chengwei
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> ~Blairo

-- 
Thanks,
Chengwei
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20171017/3f0428b9/attachment.sig>


More information about the OpenStack-docs mailing list