Open Stack

On 28/04/16 11:59, Anne Gentle wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Christian Berendt <christian at berendt.io <mailto:christian at berendt.io>> wrote:
> 
>     On 28 April 2016 at 11:51:16, Andreas Jaeger (aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com>(mailto:aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com>)) wrote:
> 
>     > Does anybody see problems with that? Otherwise let's do that before we
>     > tackle the rest of the RST conversion.
> 
>     Makes sense to me. What about the other guides?
> 
>     Should we discuss to move all guides (over the migration to RST) into the openstack-manuals repository? I do not know why we have decided in the past to create separate repositories for some of the guides.
> 
> 
> It was for enabling review teams who knew the content best. This model still makes sense for security guide to me. I'm fine with the Ops Guide going back into openstack-manuals but do check with anyone who has +2 specifically on the separate repo please.
> 

Yeah, Security Guide needs to stay in its own repo because it has different reviewing rules and needs to maintain its own core team. I've got no problem with the others moving if it's possible to do so, though.

L

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20160428/628b66c8/attachment.pgp>