Open Stack

On 04/15/2016 02:07 AM, Lana Brindley wrote:
> On 14/04/16 17:12, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> On 2016-04-14 08:26, Lana Brindley wrote:
>>> On 14/04/16 04:32, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>>> On 04/13/2016 08:01 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>>>>> Andreas,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your email. I am aware of the reviews you describe below but I was still under the impression that the status from the email on openstack-docs (Mitaka Install Guide testing) [1] and [2] were still valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> The understanding I had from those email threads is that the door hadn't yet closed. But I'll defer to the doc team; I think you understand the motivation for my request, and I respect (and fully admit that I don't understand) the complexities involved in releasing documentation.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion on this one, it's my fault as I've been giving some mixed messages.
>>>
>>> We didn't approve the spec late in March[1], simply because it was too late to propose large scale changes while we were in the throes of testing the Install Guide.
>>>
>>> What then happened was that the changes were proposed anyway[2], and we (predictably, given that we hadn't approved the spec) blocked them. However, Matt (who was doing the bulk of the testing) mentioned on the mailing list that they could potentially be merged, as they were "a relatively simple/optional service and the patch in the review queue looks fairly complete"[3]. So I definitely dropped a ball in not going back and working out whether or not to merge it. However, even if it had been merged, it still would have remained untested, which was the reason we declined the spec and the patch in the first place.
>>>
>>> Because we don't branch the Install Guide until some weeks after the release date (this is so that we can complete testing against final packages, rather than rely on pre-release packages), I think it's feasible to have this go in to the Kilo release at this stage. However, it will be untested against Kilo (and will require a note stating that) and, as Andreas noted, with large scale changes to the Install Guide looming for Newton, could be completely redesigned or removed in the next release.
>>
>> Kilo -> Mitaka I guess
>
> Yes, sorry, my bad.
>
>>
>>> If you're happy with that solution, and Andreas and Matt agree, I support having that patch merge any time (Andreas' option #2).
>>
>> I'm fine with it. Matt?
>
> As of today, Matt has announced that he's stepping down from the Install Guide, so I think we can probably go ahead and do this. Andreas, can you please remove your +2?


Matt said, he will complete Mitaka - and this is a Mitaka topic.

Let me remove my -2 nevertheless now,

Andreas
-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126