Open Stack

To reduce complexity, I think it would be cool to leave scenarios one and
two and perhaps introduce a third scenario for hybrid.

I have also noticed interest in how one would create provider networks to
get instances access to resources existing on vlan/gre/vxlan networks
outside of OpenStack world.

Matt

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com>
 wrote:

> Beside the usual configuration updates, I'm throwing around some larger
> changes to the scenarios for Liberty. Currently, the scenarios that include
> L3 only support attaching VMs to private networks and using floating IP
> addresses to enable visibility on public networks. While this design
> purposely pushes people toward implementing "true" cloud networking, I see
> considerable interest in a hybrid architecture that supports attaching VMs
> to both public and private networks. I would like to implement this
> architecture, but need to determine whether we should augment the existing
> scenarios or create separate hybrid scenarios. The former would increase
> complexity (both configuration and documentation... especially diagrams)
> and the latter would duplicate plenty of content and potentially cause
> confusion from too many options. What should we do?
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20151015/5c9b1e3a/attachment.html>