Open Stack

Keystone/Apache:

Does the package also include the /usr/bin/keystone-wsgi-admin and
/usr/bin/keystone-wsgi-public files?

Keystone:

I haven't found any problems with v3.

Cinder:

The v1 API does not exist in Liberty. I spoke with cinder developers
including the former PTL who told me to remove the service and endpoints
for v1. So far, so good in testing.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:

> On 10/13/2015 03:02 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> > As I wrote in a comment on the patch, why not simply install and
> > configure Apache separately like we do for all the other distributions
> > that don't package it with keystone?
>
> I have added a wsgi-keystone.conf file in the Keystone package, and now,
> the only thing you have to do in Debian to get Keystone to use Apache, is:
>
> - disable the .service file (with: systemctl disable keystone)
> - enable the wsgi-keystone.conf (a2ensite wsgi-keystone.conf and
> restarting apache)
>
> > Also, keystone isn't my only concern. I haven't seen any effort to test
> > Debian
>
> I'm hereby saying that I'll be working on this over the following weeks.
> Please give me a chance, as I am finished with Liberty packaging. This
> also helps me to improve the quality of Debian packages significantly by
> discussing things with the doc people.
>
> > with other significant changes for Liberty such as a completely
> > different architecture with Linux bridge instead of OVS
>
> Would you care to point me at the relevant changes? Can't we still use
> OVS? I'm sorry, I may have missed a train here...
>
> > use of only the keystone v3 API
>
> As much as I could see, the v3 API has many problems, I'm not sure if it
> is early enough to use it. If you think it is, then I'll try *more* to
> use it and set that up as default in the Debian package.
>
> > and removal of the cinder v1 API.
>
> This is completely wrong. For what I could test using Tempest, if you
> remove the v1 endpoint, Cinder simply fails in many ways. I would
> strongly advise not to remove the v1 endpoint from the install-guide. If
> you did already, then it should be reverted.
>
> Matt, let's be constructive and not destructive this time, ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20151013/78d76009/attachment-0001.html>