[OpenStack-docs] [RST] [Admin User Guide] doc-public-checkbuild test

Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com
Tue Mar 24 19:13:56 UTC 2015


On 03/24/2015 07:31 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 02:19 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Olga Gusarenko <ogusarenko at mirantis.com
>> <mailto:ogusarenko at mirantis.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys, I have problems with my patches that refer to playground admin
>>> user guide. There are probably issues with scopes.
>>> Here is the link to one of my commits:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166786
>>> It could not pass the doc-public-checkbuild test (though the build was
>>> successful locally) until I marked the files with
>>> ":scope:docs_for_admin" (and not "admin_only" as it is stated in the
>>> migration conventions).
>>> BUT now the files are not included to the guide built by Jenkins.
>>>
>>> What should I do in this case? What`s the plan for combining end-user
>>> and admin-user guides?
>>
>> Andreas and I are working on a solution with this patch:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166869/
>>
>> More eyes would be great while we look for a solution.
>> Thanks,
>> Anne
>
> I'm still struggling to get this working properly with all files, any
> help is welcome.
>
> But looking at User Guide and Admin Guide: Do we really need two guides
> that duplicate a lot? What about marking in the section title specific
> sections with "(Admin only)" instead and have one guide?

I've fixed it, the scope.py extension needed a fix,

Andreas
-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
        Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126




More information about the OpenStack-docs mailing list