Open Stack

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Olga Gusarenko <ogusarenko at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> What if the bulleted list is used instead in such cases?
>

That's a non-starter for me, these are instructions and must go in order.

I think Brian's workaround is the best option, though I absolutely love
your "we are writing the year 2015" comment, Christian. So true.

Simple markup means some tradeoffs. We knew this going into RST/Sphinx.
Anyone know if the docutils maintainers could be convinced that it's
actually <ol> that's the chunk we care about here?

Anne


>
> Olga
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Christian Berendt <christian at berendt.io>
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/28/2015 02:24 AM, Brian Moss wrote:
>>
>>> but you can manually set a number and subsequent numbering using #. will
>>> pick up from there.
>>>
>>
>> Yes of course, but I think it is a no-go to manually number lists, we are
>> writing the year 2015. It is fine for me to manually number lists when we
>> decide that we want to do this. But I think it is better to get rid of the
>> numbered lists if it is not working with the only directive.
>> Christian.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-docs mailing list
>> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Olga
>
> Technical Writer
> skype: gusarenko.olga
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>


-- 
Anne Gentle
Rackspace
Principal Engineer
www.justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150728/3c7abb7e/attachment.html>