Open Stack

Hi Christian,

I agree we should enable the Bash8 job. I had it disabled because to
address the migration of the code to new repository. I will take care of
this soon.

Regards,
Pranav

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Roger Luethi <rl at patchworkscience.org>
wrote:

> I like the idea. In order to implement it, we need to fix tox.ini so
> bashate actually skips files that are none of its business; almost all
> of the errors are due to bashate snooping around in Windows batch files
> or some configuration files.
>
> Fixing up the errors should not be a problem. Some of the warnings would
> take some work, and I'm not sure there is a good solution for all them.
> Also, it would be helpful if bashate could understand (i.e. detect and
> ignore) here-docs; see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237429/
>
> Roger
>
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:44:09 +0100, Christian Berendt wrote:
> > I want to propse to add a bash8 check to the gates for the
> > training-labs repository. The bash8 environment is already part of
> > the tox.ini file, but at the moment there is no gate job for bash8.
> >
> > Prior to adding the gate job the scripts in the training-labs
> > repository should be cleaned up, at least the errors should be
> > removed.
> >
> > 306 bashate warning(s) found
> > 23 bashate error(s) found
> >
> > Christian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20151202/0714f61f/attachment.html>