Open Stack

I'm in favor of this - I'd like to get more involved in this effort, and 
having it as a separate project might simplify that process.

     /Harry

On 05/28/2014 10:56 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sean Roberts, Stefano and I just had a very fruitful discussion 
> regarding the training manuals project.
>
> We think that it's time to allow the the training guides to become a 
> free-standing project of its own accord, and start attracting 
> significantly more people around it.
>
> This will make it easier for contributors who just want to work on 
> training to find the project, see lists of bugs and tasks relevant to 
> them*, and also provide a clearer pathway toward becoming 
> contributors, and eventually core reviewers.
>
> It will also enable the training guides project to have its own 
> policies, and allow the repository to be used for investigation of 
> training infrastructure, such as the recent forays into moodle for 
> example.
>
> However, with every change such as this, there are drawbacks, and so 
> we feel it's important to discuss these as well - and most importantly 
> get your input.
>
> For example, while we can continue to re-use tools and content, this 
> would mean a different review queue and repository - which could 
> frustrate if you are working across both projects.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> * as opposed to the 400 odd in the openstack-manuals tracker!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5079 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140529/e7249cf4/attachment.bin>