Open Stack

On 05/15/2014 11:48 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 15/05/14 11:40, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I guess I should have asked this during this morning's doc session at
>> the summit, but I hadn't had real coffee yet (only decaf!).
>>
>> How do we handle backports reviews? Is one +2 enough (that's what
>> Andreas used to do during the post havana backport storm)? Is self
>> approval a valid option?
>>
>> I'd like to hear what you guys think.
> 
> IMO: one sanity-check +2 from someone who is not the submitter

Agreed.

Also, backports should not be edited, if there are problems noticed, we
should do a patch for master to fix those and backport that one,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126