[Openstack-docs] Training Guides becoming a project in its own right?

Frans Thamura frans at meruvian.org
Tue Jun 10 17:36:03 UTC 2014


sorry forget the URL

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cVDRNboHObMnY2V1FQdWtiWXAxeFBwOW1aTFIzN0JNY1Rj/edit?usp=sharing

--
Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
Shadow Master and Lead Investor
Meruvian.
Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider.

Mobile: +628557888699
Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id)

FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian
TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian
Website: http://www.meruvian.org

"We grow because we share the same belief."


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> i share our own workshop material, still in Indonesia language, this is a
> step by step guide to install openstack nova in ubuntu
>
> we will use for students here, to install and run in FAST TRACK way.
>
> please review .. my experience teach student in 15+ to 21+, workshop
> material will fastening the adoption.
>
>
> will openstack also have something like this?
>
>
> F
>
> On Jun 10, 2014 10:02 PM, "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My experience.work here.
>>>
>>> I think all become under one doc.project will be the best, and extend
>>> training guide to workshop guide.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this move simply organizes the docs program with more repositories
>> rather than directories under one repository.
>>
>> Ideally the doc content is re-used in the training guides, and the
>> training group supplements with objectives, scripts and quizzes that are
>> unique to the needs of a training class.
>>
>>
>>>  Make all in one rather all independent.
>>>
>>> And focus.in.reuse and collaborate between subproject
>>>
>>
>> Agreed! Thanks for your vote of confidence. :)
>> Anne
>>
>>>  That my opinion
>>> On Jun 10, 2014 6:54 PM, "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Christian Berendt <
>>>> berendt at b1-systems.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/10/2014 04:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>>>> > Conversely, there is nothing in our current policies which would
>>>>> > prevent a project under incubation within an official program from
>>>>> > having its Git repository called openstack/something (and in fact we
>>>>> > seem to generally encourage it).
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not using openstack/training-guides when that's possible?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That's what I'm thinking as well, let's treat this move like the
>>>> security guide and move it to openstack/training-guides.
>>>>
>>>> I'll amend Tom's patch.
>>>>
>>>> Anne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Berendt
>>>>> Cloud Computing Solution Architect
>>>>> Mail: berendt at b1-systems.de
>>>>>
>>>>> B1 Systems GmbH
>>>>> Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
>>>>> GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>>>>> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>>>> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140611/769be651/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack-docs mailing list