Open Stack

Thanks Eoghan. I figured you'd be able to get us close. Just clarifying
some more below.


On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> OK, let me give some context/background here.
>
> Prior to late in the Icehouse cycle (i.e. Mar 26) we had used the
> check_uptodate script to ensure that a statically checked-in sample
> .conf file was up-to-date with respect to the code-level descriptions
> of these config options.
>
> This caused recurrent problems in CI, so as temporary work-around we
> disabled this check so as to unblock the gate.
>
> However there was then no guarantee that reality wouldn't slowly
> diverge from the static .conf sample, so early in Juno (Apr 18) we
> decided to follow nova's lead and also remove the static in-tree
> sample, in favor of re-generating on the fly.
>
> In the meantime, there has been a lot of churn in config caused mainly
> by:
>
> 1. a new keystoneclient release, which seems to include lots of
>    white-space/docstr related changes to the generated config
>
> 2. landing the oslo-messaging switch-over in ceilometer, which
>    deprecates all the old common RPC config options
>
> So of the 3 attachments:
>
> > Version before it disappeared in the ceilometer project:
> > ceilometer.conf.sample-5995bf906cea07e69
>
> This is a snapshot in time, which was correct on Apr 18 but has
> since been superceeded.
>
> > The one I generated from ceilometer master (April 23):
> > ceilometer.conf.sample-rl-gen
>
> This is less out-of-date, but should be re-generated from master
> as of today.
>
> > Your version that I found in openstack-manuals:
> > ceilometer.conf-manuals
>
> This is quite stale, as it seems to predate the landing of the
> oslo-messaging switchover.
>
> Note that I'm assuming all along that the docco should be based on
> master, as opposed to being in lockstep with the last release (i.e.
> the icehouse final tag).
>

Right, we want to be lockstep in our master, but we also need a frozen
version from stable/icehouse for our stable/icehouse branch. Is it correct
to generate from ceilometer stable/icehouse in order to get the
frozen-in-time version?

Thanks,
Anne


>
> Hope this helps,
> Eoghan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi all, Roger (CCed) has identified a question about the accuracy of the
> > ceilometer.conf sample file we now have in our repo. Can anyone track
> down
> > the correct information for Icehouse so we can ensure it's in the docs
> > repo?
> >
> > Eoghan, we hadn't identified a Project Doc Lead for ceilometer so I'm
> > sending to you in case you're not subscribed to the docs mailing list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anne
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Roger Luethi
> > Date: Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:36 AM
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:29:28 -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > > Did you build from the master branch of ceilometer or stable/icehouse?
> >
> > For convenience, I'll attach three versions:
> >
> > Version before it disappeared in the ceilometer project:
> > ceilometer.conf.sample-5995bf906cea07e69
> >
> > The one I generated from ceilometer master (April 23):
> > ceilometer.conf.sample-rl-gen
> >
> > Your version that I found in openstack-manuals:
> > ceilometer.conf-manuals
> >
> > Roger
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140425/c8cfc47c/attachment.html>