<div>                Nobody is working on Adjutant right now. Adrian was the PTL and he no longer works on Openstack:<br><br>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025555.html<br><br>I've asked my employer for permission to volunteer, and they are thinking about that very slowly. I would love to see someone more qualified take the PTL role. Do you want to volunteer?<br>            </div>            <div class="yahoo_quoted" style="margin:10px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid #ccc;padding-left:1ex;">                        <div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">                                <div>                    On Wednesday, December 22, 2021, 11:30:37 AM EST, Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk@ya.ru> wrote:                </div>                <div><br></div>                <div><br></div>                <div><div id="yiv2039398356"><div>Hi!</div><div> </div><div>Right now, upper-constraints [1] assumes that version of Django to be used for Yoga should be 3.2.*. In the meanwhile Adjutant obviously does not support Django 3, according to the project requirements [2]. This brings inconsistency which leads to the breakage of adjutant installation if respecting u-c because package have conflicting dependencies then.</div><div> </div><div>Based on that, I'm wondering about the way forward. Should be upper-constraints be used for Adjutant installation as for any other project? Or there's an ongoing work to bring in support for Django 3.2 to Adjutant?</div><div> </div><div>[1] https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/commit/8b5e97b6563f076206b0bfc7276ea9afd179e6b7/upper-constraints.txt#L452</div><div>[2] https://opendev.org/openstack/adjutant/src/commit/b305d7285f3ea2e12210e592702c4d66a31d6646/requirements.txt#L3</div><div><div>-- <br>Kind Regards,</div><div>Dmitriy Rabotyagov</div></div><div> </div></div></div>            </div>                </div>