<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">...I still think we should keep the starter-kit tags- if only for the openstack site and basic marketing for folks new to openstack. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">The vmt tag too is good to have I think? The other project maintained ones we should definitely drop.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Kendall (diablo_rojo)</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:51 AM Radosław Piliszek <<a href="mailto:radoslaw.piliszek@gmail.com">radoslaw.piliszek@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear OpenStack Operators,<br>
<br>
Due to no response to the original query about usefulness of the TC<br>
tags framework [1] (which was repeated in each and every following TC<br>
newsletter), the TC has decided to drop the tags framework entirely.<br>
[2] [3]<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/024804.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/024804.html</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025554.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025554.html</a><br>
[3] <a href="https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-ptg</a><br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
-yoctozepto<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>