<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/29/2021 1:28 PM, Kendall Nelson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJ6yrQhA0Lfac_isfEaT1B1JQ-w9K=JvkaiGsDYEP4FG=fv4eQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">OooOOOo
I like this idea! Would be super awesome to get a list of all
the worst, most painful issues and then fix them :) </div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Kendall </div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>I like this idea as well. I know that Cinder has some things
that can/should be put on the list.</p>
<p>--Jay</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJ6yrQhA0Lfac_isfEaT1B1JQ-w9K=JvkaiGsDYEP4FG=fv4eQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:32
PM Julia Kreger <<a
href="mailto:juliaashleykreger@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">juliaashleykreger@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:40 PM Jeremy Stanley <<a
href="mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">fungi@yuggoth.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 2021-06-28 14:25:12 -0700 (-0700), Kendall Nelson
wrote:<br>
> [...]<br>
> > the next release (Y release).<br>
><br>
> You gave me a scare, but... *phew* that's the release
after next. We<br>
> haven't released Xena yet!<br>
><br>
> > It looks like we only have one goal suggested so far
(which is<br>
> > fine; we can only have one goal)<br>
> [...]<br>
><br>
> Can we only have one goal? Or can we have only one goal?
I assume<br>
> you mean the latter, but they're definitely different
things.<br>
> --<br>
> Jeremy Stanley<br>
<br>
I have a crazy idea!<br>
<br>
What if instead of a common singular goal to uniformly raise
the bar<br>
across projects, we have each project work on their *most*
painful<br>
operator perceived performance or experience issue and attempt
to try<br>
and eliminate the issue or perception? And where cross-project<br>
integrations are involved, other projects could put review
priority on<br>
helping get fixes or improvements pushed forward to address
such<br>
operator experiences.<br>
<br>
Such an effort would take a dramatically different appearance
by<br>
project, and would really require each project to identify a
known<br>
issue, and then to report it back along with the gain they
yielded<br>
from the effort. Of course, to get there, projects would also
have to<br>
ensure that they could somehow measure the impact of their
changes to<br>
remedy such an issue.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>