<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">As far .rst guidelines these are human-readable format of .json form.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Json is the primary one. The tooling for conversion from json to rst is lacking behind.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There is tooling that was developed many years ago and it was for schema 1.0.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For last several years and guidelines were using schema 2.0 and we are looking<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">for extending jsantorst tool to schema 2.0 and support for add-on guidelines.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Martin Kopec <mkopec@redhat.com> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 28, 2021 3:05 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> openstack-discuss<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [interop] Interop Testing Guidelines<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p><span style="color:#CE1126">[EXTERNAL EMAIL] <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">After reading the 2016.08/procedure.rst file, some of the info there is true and some of it is outdated.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I don't know why later guidelines don't contain the procedure.rst, I wasn't around when that decision<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">was made. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I would propose to update the linked procedure.rst file and move it outside of the specific guideline<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">directory. The procedure doesn't usually change with newer guidelines, so it's ok to have just one.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I'll make a note in the agenda so that this can be brought up during the next team meeting:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/etherpad.opendev.org/p/interop__;!!LpKI!2TrmHazspAlN8FySo7lDvQaX73p8WvH0rLj8B2uwwp2K8dWbNX1Mf0frysQwV3xlcNUF$">https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/interop [etherpad.opendev.org]</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 23:32, Jeremy Stanley <<a href="mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org">fungi@yuggoth.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">On 2021-05-27 21:17:48 +0000 (+0000), Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:<br>
> Maybe you are looking at old location. We had moved repo to<br>
> opendev with all others.<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
That's where he linked to in his message, if you read it carefully.<br>
What he's pointing out, and I can easily confirm as well, is that<br>
there's no procedure.rst file for later guideline versions. Perhaps<br>
that's intentional? Is the old procedure.rst in the 2016.08<br>
directory meant to apply to later versions of the guidelines as<br>
well? If so, that's not obvious.<br>
-- <br>
Jeremy Stanley<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<br>
-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Martin<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>