<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:52 PM Gaël Chamoulaud <<a href="mailto:gchamoul@redhat.com">gchamoul@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 09/Mar/2021 17:46, Marios Andreou wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Gaël Chamoulaud <<a href="mailto:gchamoul@redhat.com" target="_blank">gchamoul@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi TripleO Devs,<br>
> <br>
> David is already a key member of our team since a long time now, he<br>
> provided all the needed ansible roles for the Validation Framework into<br>
> tripleo-ansible-operator. He continuously provides excellent code reviews<br>
> and he<br>
> is a source of great ideas for the future of the Validation Framework.<br>
> That's<br>
> why we would highly benefit from his addition to the core reviewer team.<br>
> <br>
> Assuming that there are no objections, we will add David to the core team<br>
> next<br>
> week.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> o/ Gael<br>
> <br>
> so it is clear and fair for everyone (e.g. I've been approached by others about<br>
> candidates for tripleo-core)<br>
> <br>
> I'd like to be clear on your proposal here because I don't think we have a<br>
> 'validation framework core' group in gerrit - do we?<br>
> <br>
> Is your proposal that David is added to the tripleo-core group [1] with the<br>
> understanding that voting rights will be exercised only in the following repos:<br>
> tripleo-validations, validations-common and validations-libs?<br>
<br>
Yes exactly! Sorry for the confusion.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>ACK no problem ;) As I said we need to be transparent and fair towards everyone.<br><br>+1 from me to your proposal. <br><br>Being obligated to do so at PTL ;) I did a quick review of activities. I can see that David has been particularly active in Wallaby [1] but has made tripleo contributions going back to 2017 [2] - I cannot see some reason to object to the proposal!<br><br>regards, marios<br><br>[1] <a href="https://www.stackalytics.io/?module=tripleo-group&project_type=openstack&user_id=davidjpeacock&metric=marks&release=wallaby">https://www.stackalytics.io/?module=tripleo-group&project_type=openstack&user_id=davidjpeacock&metric=marks&release=wallaby</a><br>[2] <a href="https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:davidjpeacock">https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:davidjpeacock</a><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> thanks, marios<br>
> <br>
> [1] <a href="https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/</a><br>
> 0319cee8020840a3016f46359b076fa6b6ea831a<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Thanks, David, for your excellent work!<br>
> <br>
> --<br>
> Gaël Chamoulaud - (He/Him/His)<br>
> .::. Red Hat .::. OpenStack .::.<br>
> .::. DFG:DF Squad:VF .::.<br>
> <br>
<br>
--<br>
Gaël Chamoulaud - (He/Him/His)<br>
.::. Red Hat .::. OpenStack .::.<br>
.::. DFG:DF Squad:VF .::.<br>
</blockquote></div></div>