<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2020-06-29 19:55, Brian Haley wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:6eb59b06-9492-2581-b0b0-b5545361f745@gmail.com">
      <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;"><br>
        But some sort of pool of "additional" <s>public</s>
        globally unique
        <br>
        prefixes that can be requested, bound and routed to an instance
        would be
        <br>
        nice - kinda like
        <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/openstack/r/compute_floatingip_v2.html#example-usage"
          moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/openstack/r/compute_floatingip_v2.html#example-usage</a>
        <br>
        .
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      We made a conscious decision to not support floating IPv6 in the
      base reference implementation, although it is available in one of
      the third-party drivers (Midonet?).  Making the tenant IPv6
      subnets reachable directly was instead the goal, which happens
      when PD is used.
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I suppose you are talking about this fip64 feature -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.midonet.org/docs/latest-en/operations-guide/content/fip64.html">https://docs.midonet.org/docs/latest-en/operations-guide/content/fip64.html</a>
      //
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.openstack.org/networking-midonet/latest/user/features.html">https://docs.openstack.org/networking-midonet/latest/user/features.html</a>
      ?<br>
    </p>
    <p>Just in case there might be a misunderstanding in what I
      described ... "floating ip" for IPv4 would translate to "floating
      prefix" (out of a pool, with a limit on the number of those a
      tenant might use/request) in my suggested case and the routing
      sending the traffic of that prefix to an interface.<br>
      Certainly no single ipv6 addresses / 128 shall be "floating"
      around or be mapped to a fixed IPv4 to make things even more
      complicated.</p>
    <p>It's just a about being able to provide an instance with a global
      prefix of its own to do networky things.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:6eb59b06-9492-2581-b0b0-b5545361f745@gmail.com">
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">What would be the
        process of getting such a feature into a working
        <br>
        specification in case one was interested in implementing this?
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      It's outlined in the neutron docs, but basically it starts with a
      bug describing the feature you'd like to add, it's then discussed
      at a weekly meeting each Friday.
      <br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/ussuri/contributor/policies/blueprints.html"
        moz-do-not-send="true">https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/ussuri/contributor/policies/blueprints.html</a>
      <br>
      <br>
      -Brian
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Thanks for that immediate pointer.<br>
      I shall be discussing this with some folks here and might get back
      to writing one of those blueprints.</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Regards</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Christian<br>
    </p>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>