<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:10 PM Ghanshyam Mann <<a href="mailto:gmann@ghanshyammann.com">gmann@ghanshyammann.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> ---- On Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:19:32 -0500 Brian Rosmaita <<a href="mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com" target="_blank">rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com</a>> wrote ----<br>
> On 3/6/20 6:12 PM, Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote:<br>
> > <br>
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:53 AM Brian Rosmaita <br>
> > <<a href="mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com" target="_blank">rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com" target="_blank">rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> > <br>
> > On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:<br>
> > > ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com" target="_blank">rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com" target="_blank">rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com</a>>><br>
> > wrote ----<br>
> > > > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the<br>
> > > > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0]. <br>
> > Currently, the<br>
> > > > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is<br>
> > > > <a href="https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members</a><br>
> > > > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd<br>
> > like to<br>
> > > > replace them by including the cinder-core group.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.<br>
> > <br>
> > Great, thanks!<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > I agree this is a great idea to have more members of Cinder joining the <br>
> > devstack-plugin-ceph team. I would like to have atleast a sub team of <br>
> > manila core reviewers added to this project if it makes sense. The <br>
> > Manila CephFS drivers (cephfs-native and cephfs-nfs) are currently being <br>
> > tested with the help of the devstack integration in devstack-plugin-ceph.<br>
> > <br>
> > We have Tom Barron (tbarron) in the team, i'd like to propose myself <br>
> > (gouthamr) and Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc)<br>
> > <br>
> > Please let me know what you think of the idea.<br>
> <br>
> I've got no objection from the Cinder side. I would also not object to <br>
> adding the manila-core group instead of individuals. It's certainly in <br>
> your team's interest to keep this thing stable and working, just as it <br>
> is for the Cinder team.<br>
<br>
Agree, I think adding manila group will be helpful, let me know if ok for you<br>
and accordinfgly I will make changes. <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sure thing, works for me. Thanks Brian and Ghanshyam. <br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
-gmann<br>
<br>
> <br>
> > <br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the<br>
> > > > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1]. Currently, the<br>
> > > > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is<br>
> > > > <a href="https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members</a><br>
> > > > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the<br>
> > > > individual members with the cinder-core group. We also<br>
> > propose that<br>
> > > > devstack-core be added as an included group.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new<br>
> > devstack plugin:<br>
> > > > openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas<br>
> > > > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being<br>
> > introduced<br>
> > > > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in<br>
> > Victoria. Our<br>
> > > > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core<br>
> > included groups<br>
> > > > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?<br>
> > <br>
> > I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would<br>
> > own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.<br>
> > <br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs<br>
> > repo be moved<br>
> > > > back into the 'openstack' namespace?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we<br>
> > have any other) then<br>
> > > it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.<br>
> > > Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder<br>
> > governance or QA.<br>
> > <br>
> > Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have<br>
> > permission to make changes there.<br>
> > <br>
> > ><br>
> > > Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your<br>
> > proposal of calloborative maintainance by<br>
> > > devstack-core and cinder-core.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > -gmann<br>
> > <br>
> > Thanks for the quick response!<br>
> > <br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > [0] <a href="https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph</a><br>
> > > > [1] <a href="https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs</a><br>
> > > > [2]<br>
> > <a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache</a><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
</blockquote></div></div>