<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Not sure what are the benefits on combining UC and TC.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think the real issue is that as community shrunk from several years back,
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">we need to adjust what UC , TC and overall community can deliver.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Adjusting the scope.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But UC and TC are engaged in governing different activities.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And while two Cs are part of larger openstack community as the whole, and many folks work in both U and T communities of openstack they do have different goals and represent different aspects of overall openstack community.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think reducing C sizes, and deliverables makes sense, why they should be combined still eludes me.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do agree that hardwiring UC size into bylaws was a mistake.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<br>
Arkady <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Jim Rollenhagen <jim@jimrollenhagen.com> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 25, 2020 12:16 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [tc] Presence at OpenDev Vancouver in June<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p><span style="color:#CE1126">[EXTERNAL EMAIL] <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I sadly will not make it to Vancouver :(<br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
// jim<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:01 AM Jean-Philippe Evrard <<a href="mailto:jean-philippe@evrard.me">jean-philippe@evrard.me</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hello,<br>
<br>
I am filling the survey for the room booking during the OpenDev summit<br>
in Vancouver. Do you already know if you will attend, this way we have<br>
a first guesstimate of the attendance?<br>
<br>
Can you answer it here by Thursday, please?<br>
<br>
FYI: I thought of booking for min 1.5 days, maximum time 2 days, as<br>
last time we finished the marathon in two days.<br>
<br>
For the room format, I like the roundtable (was wondering to add extra<br>
seats next to the roundtable for people joining), however it's only<br>
around 10 persons per table, which won't be enough for us all if<br>
everyone attends.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
JP<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>