<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.gmaildefault
{mso-style-name:gmail_default;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Is there a need for Ironic integration one?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Alan Bishop <abishop@redhat.com> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 4, 2020 2:20 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Francesco Pantano<br>
<b>Cc:</b> John Fulton; Wesley Hayutin; OpenStack Discuss; Phil Weeks<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [tripleo] rework of triple squads and the tripleo mtg.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p><span style="color:#CE1126">[EXTERNAL EMAIL] <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:22 AM Francesco Pantano <<a href="mailto:fpantano@redhat.com">fpantano@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Courier New",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:45 PM John Fulton <<a href="mailto:johfulto@redhat.com" target="_blank">johfulto@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:13 AM Wesley Hayutin <<a href="mailto:whayutin@redhat.com" target="_blank">whayutin@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Greetings,<br>
><br>
> As mentioned at the previous tripleo meeting [1], we're going to revisit the current tripleo squads and the expectations for those squads at the tripleo meeting.<br>
><br>
> Currently we have the following squads..<br>
> 1. upgrades<br>
> 2. edge<br>
> 3. integration<br>
> 4. validations<br>
> 5. networking<br>
> 6. transformation<br>
> 7. ci<br>
><br>
> A reasonable update could include the following..<br>
><br>
> 1. validations<br>
> 2. transformation<br>
> 3. mistral-to-ansible<br>
> 4. CI<br>
> 5. Ceph / Integration?? maybe just Ceph?<br>
<br>
I'm fine with "Ceph". The original intent of going from "Ceph<br>
Integration" to the more generic "Integration" was that it could<br>
include anyone using external-deploy-steps to deploy non-openstack<br>
projects with TripleO (k8s, skydive, etc). Though those things<br>
happened, we didn't really get anyone else to join the squad or update<br>
our etherpad so I'm fine with renaming it to Ceph. We're still active<br>
but our etherpad was getting old. I updated it just now. <o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Gulio? Francesco? Alan?<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<span class="gmaildefault"><span style="font-family:"Courier New",serif">Agree here and I also updated the etherpad as well [1] w/</span></span><span style="font-family:"Courier New",serif"><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">our current status and the open topics we still have on
</span><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">ceph side.</span><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">Not sure if we want to use "Integration" since the topics</span><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">couldn't be only ceph related but can involve other storage</span><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">components.</span><br>
</span><br>
<span class="gmaildefault">Giulio, Alan, wdyt?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">"Ceph integration" makes the most sense to me, but I'm fine with just naming it "Ceph" as we all know what that means.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Alan<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
John<br>
<br>
> 6. others??<br>
><br>
> The squads should reflect major current efforts by the TripleO team IMHO.<br>
><br>
> For the meetings, I would propose we use this time and space to give context to current reviews in progress and solicit feedback. It's also a good time and space to discuss any upstream blockers for those reviews.<br>
><br>
> Let's give this one week for comments etc.. Next week we'll update the etherpad list and squads. The etherpad list will be a decent way to communicate which reviews need attention.<br>
><br>
> Thanks all!!!<br>
><br>
> [1] <a href="http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-01-07-14.00.log.html" target="_blank">
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-01-07-14.00.log.html</a><br>
><br>
><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Courier New",serif">[1] <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Courier New",serif;color:#888888">Francesco Pantano<br>
GPG KEY: F41BD75C</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>