<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">Hello, </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">Those numbers are actually min and max times requested by PTLs/group leads/chairs. It was used more for planning purposes. I should have taken them out before sending :) </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Kendall (diablo_rojo)</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:56 AM Akihiro Motoki <<a href="mailto:amotoki@gmail.com">amotoki@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Kendall,<br>
<br>
Looking at the updated version of the schedule, neutron has 2.5 days<br>
but actually 3 days are assigned to neutron.<br>
As horizon PTL and neutron core, hopefully neutron session starts from<br>
Wednesday afternoon (and horizon has Wed morning session).<br>
<br>
In addition, I see "1.5 or 3.5" or "2 or 3.5" in several projects. I<br>
guess they are the number of days assigned, but two numbers are very<br>
different so I wonder what this means.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Akihiro Motoki (irc: amotoki)<br>
<br>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 1:59 AM Kendall Nelson <<a href="mailto:kennelson11@gmail.com" target="_blank">kennelson11@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello Everyone!<br>
><br>
> Here is an updated schedule: <a href="https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/z9iLyv8e/pvg-ptg-sched-2" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/z9iLyv8e/pvg-ptg-sched-2</a><br>
><br>
> The changes that were made are adding OpenStack QA to be all day Wednesday and shifting StarlingX to start on Wednesday and putting OpenStack Ops on Thursday afternoon.<br>
><br>
> Please let me know if there are any conflicts!<br>
><br>
> -Kendall (diablo_rojo)<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 2:13 PM Kendall Nelson <<a href="mailto:kennelson11@gmail.com" target="_blank">kennelson11@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hello Everyone!<br>
>><br>
>> In the attached picture or link [0] you will find the proposed schedule for the various tracks at the Shanghai PTG in November.<br>
>><br>
>> We did our best to avoid the key conflicts that the track leads (PTLs, SIG leads...) mentioned in their PTG survey responses, although there was no perfect solution that would avoid all conflicts especially when the event is three-ish days long and we have over 40 teams meeting.<br>
>><br>
>> If there are critical conflicts we missed or other issues, please let us know, by October 6th at 7:00 UTC!<br>
>><br>
>> -Kendall (diablo_rojo)<br>
>><br>
>> [0] <a href="https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/00mZ3Q3M/pvg_ptg_schedule.png" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/00mZ3Q3M/pvg_ptg_schedule.png</a><br>
</blockquote></div>