[ironic][ptg] vPTG scheduling

Julia Kreger juliaashleykreger at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 22:07:05 UTC 2023


Sounds good to me!

Thanks!

-Julia

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:54 PM Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> wrote:

>
> That sync is exactly what I hoped
>
> >
> I propose that after the Ironic meeting on March 20, we shortly sync up in
> the Bobcat PTG etherpad (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-bobcat-ptg)
> to pick topics and assign time.
>
> ^ that would be.
>
> Does that sound good to you? If it comes out in there we need more time,
> we should also have interested parties around to book it.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:41 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think there is a bit of a challenge to navigate though in that the PTG
>> as a sync point is needed especially on items which may take more than just
>> one cycle to deliver. A great example is driver composition. The other
>> unknown is if people are just not interested in some topics, which can
>> result in that topic being very quick.
>>
>> One thing we also did in the past is guess how much time as a group in
>> advance. I know for a few cycles we had a quick 15 minute call to discuss
>> sizing.  Based upon output from that, I think we could adjust the time
>> slots accordingly. Maybe that might make sense to do?
>>
>> -Julia
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:08 PM Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not opposed to adding more time necessarily, but I wonder if the
>>> solution is to triage what we talk about better.
>>>
>>> Last PTG, we planned several features which we didn't have enough
>>> contribution to complete. IMO, it might be better to limit what we discuss
>>> to things that are likely to be accomplished next cycle. If we can't
>>> determine that without more discussion, then sure, let's add vPTG sessions..
>>>
>>> Is there a suggestion as to specifically what times, and how much to
>>> add?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jay Faulkner
>>>
>>>> [trim]
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230314/16ce509e/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list