Open Stack

I'm not opposed to adding more time necessarily, but I wonder if the
solution is to triage what we talk about better.

Last PTG, we planned several features which we didn't have enough
contribution to complete. IMO, it might be better to limit what we discuss
to things that are likely to be accomplished next cycle. If we can't
determine that without more discussion, then sure, let's add vPTG sessions..

Is there a suggestion as to specifically what times, and how much to add?

Thanks,
Jay Faulkner

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:43 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greetings!
>
> Time slot wise, I think that works for me.
>
> Time wise, in regards to the amount, I'm wondering if we need more.  By my
> count, we have 11 new topics, 4 topics to revisit, in about six hours
> of non-operator dedicated time, not accounting for breaks for coffee/tea.
> Granted, some topics might be super quick at the 10 minute quick poll of
> the room, whereas other topics I feel like will require extensive
> discussion. If I were to size them, I think we would have 6 large-ish
> topics along with 3-4 medium sized topics.
>
> -Julia
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 3:19 PM Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> The vPTG will be upon us soon, the week of March 27.
>>
>> I booked the following times on behalf of Ironic + BM SIG Operator hour,
>> in accordance with what times worked in Antelope. It's my hope that since
>> we've had little contributor turnover, these times continue to work. I'm
>> completely open to having things moved around if it's more convenient to
>> participants.
>>
>> I've booked the following times, all in Folsom:
>> - Tuesday 1400 UTC - 1700 UTC
>> - Wednesday 1300 UTC Operator hour: baremetal SIG
>> - Wednesday 1400 UTC - 1600 UTC
>> - Wednesday 2200 - 2300 UTC
>>
>>
>> I propose that after the Ironic meeting on March 20, we shortly sync up
>> in the Bobcat PTG etherpad (
>> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-bobcat-ptg) to pick topics and
>> assign time.
>>
>>
>> Again, this is all meant to be a suggestion, I'm happy to move things
>> around but didn't want us to miss out on getting things booked.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Jay Faulkner
>> Ironic PTL
>> TC Member
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230314/0f2f6ed5/attachment.htm>