Open Stack

On 7/15/23 16:27, Tobias Urdin wrote:
> The effort is mostly now to get/find a supported third-party Python library that does not
> use asyncio for usage in a oslo.messaging driver.

Sorry to ask, but what's the problem with asyncio? Do we want something 
*not* async? If yes, why?

> Unfortunately I didn’t get any feedback from the company maintaining the nats.py library
> on supported developer time implemeting the sync client feature, I assume (my view) that
> they didn’t like that we cannot guarantee that NATS would become a core component (or used, or the primary bus)
> in the ecosystem (since we don’t, and don’t want to for that matter, force a backend/driver on operators).
> 
> Any help is of course appreciated, right now this is not a top priority and I don’t spend any full-time
> effort into it.

Would it help if I was packaging NATS in Debian (and therefore, as a 
consequence, in Ubuntu)? By reading the go.mod, it feels like it has a 
reasonable amount of dependencies (though I didn't check for the 
indirect ones), so it feels like doable...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)