[all][stable][ptl] Propose to EOL Rocky series

Radosław Piliszek radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com
Sat Jan 28 10:54:23 UTC 2023


Masakari is happy to EOL Rocky too.

Radek
-yoctozepto

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:59, Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing all this cleanup work Elod. Ironic is OK with retirements of these shared resources up to Train.
>
> -
> Jay Faulkner
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Elõd Illés <elod.illes at est.tech> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose
>> to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
>>
>> - gates are mostly broken
>> - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch
>> - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL
>>   recently (like ironic, neutron, nova)
>> - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax
>> - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public
>>   maintenance window date and hard to maintain
>>
>> Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open
>> their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable
>> series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to
>> this mail.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Előd Illés
>> irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
>>
>> [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030.html
>>



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list