[all] Any good alternatives to uwsgi?

Dmitriy Rabotyagov noonedeadpunk at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 09:59:04 UTC 2023


At the very least I'd say that the wsgi server used in projects should
be standardized and be part of PTI. Previous TC meeting was already
hot and full of time-consuming topics, so I've added uwsgi topic for
the next meeting agenda.

чт, 23 февр. 2023 г. в 10:21, Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.bauza at gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> Le jeu. 23 févr. 2023 à 09:30, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> a écrit :
>>
>> On 2/22/23 22:55, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:14:24 +0100
>> > Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It's been a few Debian release that all OpenStack APIs are served using
>> >> uwsgi. Unfortunately:
>> >
>> > Swift uses eventlet, doesn't it?
>> >
>> > -- Pete
>>
>> Yeah. We tried hard to make both Swift and Glance use uwsgi, but these
>> services simply fail in very subtle ways. It's not obvious that they
>> fail at first, but they really do. I very much believe this is a defect
>> in both projects, and that they should invest time working on this.
>>
>> Anyways, for the time being, I believe I'll continue using uwsgi for as
>> long as the project is still in maintenance mode. Uwsgi is by far the
>> best, as much as I can tell.
>>
>
> Shouldn't we somehow identify whether DevStack is at risk given our hard dependency on uwsgi and should we as service project teams somehow kick-off some coordinated brainstorming efforts to identify the risks and mitigate them ?
>
> Sounds a goal to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>>
>>



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list