[all] Any good alternatives to uwsgi?

Sylvain Bauza sylvain.bauza at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 09:19:16 UTC 2023


Le jeu. 23 févr. 2023 à 09:30, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> a écrit :

> On 2/22/23 22:55, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:14:24 +0100
> > Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> >> It's been a few Debian release that all OpenStack APIs are served using
> >> uwsgi. Unfortunately:
> >
> > Swift uses eventlet, doesn't it?
> >
> > -- Pete
>
> Yeah. We tried hard to make both Swift and Glance use uwsgi, but these
> services simply fail in very subtle ways. It's not obvious that they
> fail at first, but they really do. I very much believe this is a defect
> in both projects, and that they should invest time working on this.
>
> Anyways, for the time being, I believe I'll continue using uwsgi for as
> long as the project is still in maintenance mode. Uwsgi is by far the
> best, as much as I can tell.
>
>
Shouldn't we somehow identify whether DevStack is at risk given our hard
dependency on uwsgi and should we as service project teams somehow kick-off
some coordinated brainstorming efforts to identify the risks and mitigate
them ?

Sounds a goal to me.

Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230223/c2f9956d/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list