Open Stack

Do you think this is my issue? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceph/+bug/1968369

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:05 PM Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Eugen,
>
> This is what I did, let me know if I missed anything.
>
> root at ceph1:~# ceph osd blacklist ls
> 192.168.3.12:0/0 2023-02-17T04:48:54.381763+0000
> 192.168.3.22:0/753370860 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.22:0/2833179066 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.22:0/1812968936 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.22:6824/2057987683 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.21:0/2756666482 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> 192.168.3.21:0/1646520197 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> 192.168.3.22:6825/2057987683 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.21:0/526748613 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> 192.168.3.21:6815/2454821797 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> 192.168.3.22:0/288537807 2023-02-17T04:47:08.185434+0000
> 192.168.3.21:0/4161448504 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> 192.168.3.21:6824/2454821797 2023-02-17T05:16:23.939511+0000
> listed 13 entries
>
> root at ceph1:~# rbd lock list --image
> 55dbf40b-0a6a-4bab-b3a5-b4bb74e963af_disk -p vms
> There is 1 exclusive lock on this image.
> Locker         ID                    Address
> client.268212  auto 139971105131968  192.168.3.12:0/1649312807
>
> root at ceph1:~# ceph osd blacklist rm 192.168.3.12:0/1649312807
> 192.168.3.12:0/1649312807 isn't blocklisted
>
> How do I create a lock?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:45 AM Eugen Block <eblock at nde.ag> wrote:
>
>> In addition to Sean's response, this has been asked multiple times,
>> e.g. [1]. You could check if your hypervisors gave up the lock on the
>> RBDs or if they are still locked (rbd status <pool>/<image>), in that
>> case you might need to blacklist the clients and see if that resolves
>> anything. Do you have regular snapshots (or backups) to be able to
>> rollback in case of a curruption?
>>
>> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg45937.html
>>
>>
>> Zitat von Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com>:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 09:56 -0500, Satish Patel wrote:
>> >> Folks,
>> >>
>> >> I am running a small 3 node compute/controller with 3 node ceph
>> storage in
>> >> my lab. Yesterday, because of a power outage all my nodes went down.
>> After
>> >> reboot of all nodes ceph seems to show good health and no error (in
>> ceph
>> >> -s).
>> >>
>> >> When I started using the existing VM I noticed the following errors.
>> Seems
>> >> like data loss. This is a lab machine and has zero activity on vms but
>> >> still loses data and the file system corrupt. Is this normal ?
>> > if the vm/cluster hard crashes due to the power cut yes it can.
>> > personally i have hit this more often with XFS then ext4 but i have
>> > seen it with both.
>> >>
>> >> I am not using eraser coding, does that help in this matter?
>> >>
>> >> blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 233000 op 0x1: (WRITE)
>> flags
>> >> 0x800 phys_seg 8 prio class 0
>> >
>> > you will proably need to rescue the isntance and repair the
>> > filesystem of each vm with fsck
>> > or similar. so boot with recue image -> repair filestem -> unrescue
>> > -> hardreboot/start vm if needed
>> >
>> > you might be able to mitigate this somewhat by disableing disk
>> > cacheing at teh qemu level but
>> > that will reduce performance. ceph recommenes that you use
>> > virtio-scis fo the device model and
>> > writeback cach mode. we generally recommend that too however you can
>> > use the disk_cachemodes option to
>> > chage that.
>> >
>> https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#libvirt.disk_cachemodes
>> >
>> > [libvirt]
>> > disk_cachemodes=file=none,block=none,network=none
>> >
>> > this curreption may also have happend on the cecph cluter side.
>> > they have some options that can help prevent that via journaling wirtes
>> >
>> > if you can afford it i would get even a small UPS to allow a
>> > graceful shutdown if you have future powercuts
>> > to aovid dataloss issues.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230216/855b022b/attachment.htm>