Open Stack

Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck at cern.ch> 于2023年2月3日周五 01:05写道：
>
> Hi!
>
> Here at CERN we do not have separate Ironic controllers for ARM,
> but we do not use the standard Ironic tftp setup either: we have
> an "Ironic external" PXE/tftp service we rely on. What you will need
> to make sure, though, is that you indeed serve architecture dependent
> files via tftp. If I remember correctly, we do this via the architecture/firmware
> information that is sent with the initial DHCP request, and an if statementThank you so  much.
> somewhere :)
>
> (We should write a blog post with all the details, but I am happy to
> dig out the details on how this works before -- if you think this would
> be useful for you?)

Thank you so much, that would be great.
But actually, I would do this follow the steps in the installation
documentation[1] which were mentioned by Julia Kreger. I need to
prioritize the project native content as much as possible.

So this blog I can only be a reference, will not follow it
completely.I don't want to waste your time, I hope you don't write
because of my needs. But if you think he's useful and available for
the project, as someone who doesn't know much about ironic,

[1] https://files.openstack.org/docs/ironic/victoria/install/configure-pxe.html#pxe-multi-architecture-setup


>
> Cheers,
>  Arne
>
> --
> Arne Wiebalck
> CERN IT
>
> ________________________________________
> From: 韩光宇 <hanguangyu2 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2023 17:32
> To: openstack-discuss
> Subject: [ironic]Could I use x86 ironic to deploy arm bare metal node?
>
> Hi,
>
> I deploy ironic in x86 env, could I use it to deploy arm bare metal node?
>
> My concern is mainly whether the files transferred in the tftp phase
> of PXE cannot be cross-architecture.
>
> Do I need to deploy a dedicated arm-architecture ironic-conductor node
> for arm-architecture bare metal nodes?
>
> Thanks
>