Open Stack

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 12:57 PM Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Feedback from SDK/OSC team on one item that got my attention
>
>
> # Bridge gap between Glance client and OSC
> Last cycle we have prepared the list of missing commands [2] and started
> submitting patches to implement the same. Our biggest hurdle at the moment
> is lack of reviews from the osc team (which has only one/two cores). Glance
> PTL is going to communicate with TC/existing core(s) of OSC whether they
> can add any glance core to the team so that we can prioritize our work and
> get reviews immediately. This cycle we are planning to complete this work.
>
>
> At the moment SDK/CLI core group is having 27 members, which should be
> already a sign. We have an agreement with all teams and add certain members
> into the core group to be able to review changes for their corresponding
> services (with a limitation that they are NOT by default setting W+1).
> You have noticed pretty correct - at the moment there is not so much
> activity on our side due to lack of reviewers. But that is not blocking any
> change once there is a +2 review from the service representatives. That
> means that if Glance team opens change and another Glance team member
> leaves +2 those changes are having absolutely different priority and we
> normally approving them fast (unless there is something preventing that).
> What we want to prevent is that every team is pulling project into their
> direction breaking certain rules or conventions.
>
> Please provide me the list of members you would like to get SDK/CLI core
> rights and I would gladly add them (one more time - no workflow+1)
>
> Artem
>
>
Hi Artem,

We have the discussion in the team and Abhishek & Cyril are ready to join
the SDK/CLI core group to speed up the reviews on glance related changes.
Please provide the SDK/CLI core rights to @Abhishek Kekane
<akekane at redhat.com> & @Cyril Roelandt <cyril at redhat.com>.


Thanks,
Pranali Deore
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230410/931f68e1/attachment-0001.htm>