[nova][placement][tempest] Hold your rechecks

Sylvain Bauza sbauza at redhat.com
Tue Nov 29 08:33:03 UTC 2022


(early morning, needing a coffee apparently)

Le mar. 29 nov. 2022 à 09:32, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> a écrit :

>
>
> Le lun. 28 nov. 2022 à 14:28, Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>> Sorry folks, that's kind of an email I hate writing but let's be honest :
>> our gate is busted.
>> Until we figure out a correct path for resolution, I hereby ask you to
>> *NOT* recheck in order to not spill our precious CI resources for tests
>> that are certain to fail.
>>
>> Long story story, there are currently two problems :
>> #1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/1940425 nova-ovs-hybrid-plug and nova-next
>> jobs 100% fail due to a port remaining in down state.
>> #2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1960346 nova-lvm job 100% fails
>> due to a volume detach failure probably due to QEMU
>>
>>
>>
> Today's update :
>
>
>> #1 is currently investigated by the Neutron team meanwhile a patch [1]
>> has been proposed against Zuul to skip the failing tests.
>> Unfortunately, this patch [1] is unable to merge due to #2.
>>
>>
> Good news, kudos to the Neutron team which delivered a bugfix against the
> rootcause, which is always better than just skipping tests (and lacking
> then coverage).
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/837780/18
>
> Accordingly, [1] is no longer necessary and has been abandoned after a
> recheck to verify the job runs.
>
>
>
>> #2 has a Tempest patch that's being worked on [2] but the current state
>> of this patch is WIP.
>> We somehow need to have an agreement on the way forward during this
>> afternoon (UTC) to identify whether we can reasonably progress on [2] or
>> skip the failing tests on nova-lvm.
>>
>>
> Given [2] is hard to write, gmann proposed a patch [3] for skipping some
> nova-lvm tests. Reviews of [3] ongoing, should be hopefully merged today
> around noon UTC.
>
> Once [3] is merged, the gate should be unblocked.
> Again, an email will be sent once we progress on [3].
> -S
>
>
>> Again, sorry about the bad news and I'll keep you informed.
>> -Sylvain
>>
>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865658/
>> [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842240
>>
> [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865922
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20221129/3d1e0845/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list