[ironic] Thoughts on closing some branches

Riccardo Pittau elfosardo at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 08:27:42 UTC 2022


All good for both points, thanks Iury!

Ciao,
Riccardo

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:19 PM Iury Gregory <iurygregory at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Ironicers o/
>
> I would like to gather some feedback before moving forward with the
> oficial request to close some branches.
>
> 1) Closing some bugfix branches
> I would like to check if we are ok with closing all other bugfix branches
> except for:
> *ironic:* bugfix/20.2 | bugfix/19.0 | bugfix/18.1
> *ironic-python-agent:* bugfix/8.6 | bugfix/8.3 | bugfix/8.1
> *ironic-inspector:* bugfix/10.12 | bugfix/10.9 | bugfix/10.7
> These are the branches I know people use, but it's good to double check
> before removing all other bugfix/*.
>
> The reason to close is because it became a bit more complicated to
> maintain CI working properly in those branches, so if we don't have people
> using and looking at backports and making CI work I think we can close them.
>
> 2) Closing all stable branches pre-train.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> *Att[]'s*
>
> *Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira *
> *MSc in Computer Science at UFCG*
> *Ironic PTL *
> *Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil*
> *Social*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory
> *E-mail:  iurygregory at gmail.com <iurygregory at gmail.com>*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220628/42aa4b2d/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list